Log

Court Log, Friday, Sept. 17, 2021

Westfield District Court
Friday, Sept. 17, 2021

Carlos Vergara, 20, of 10 W. School St., Westfield, submitted to facts sufficient to warrant a guilty finding for a charge of assault and battery brought by Westfield police and the charge was continued without a finding with probation for 18 months. In a second case brought by Russell police, Vergara was found to be responsible for a charge of malicious destruction of property valued more than $1,200. In a third case, charges of assault with a dangerous weapon, malicious destruction of property valued less than $1,200 and assault and battery brought against Vergara by Westfield police were dismissed at the request of the commonwealth.

Zeven C. Bailey, 32, of 199 Hampden Road, Somers, Conn., submitted to facts sufficient to warrant a guilty finding for a charge of possession of a class A drug brought by Westfield police and the charge was continued without a finding with probation for one year. In a second case brought by Agawam police, Bailey submitted to facts sufficient to warrant a guilty finding for a charge of possession of a class A drug and the charge was continued without a finding with probation for one year.

A charge of operating a motor vehicle with a suspended license brought against Danielle L. Roberts, 36, of 106 Franklin St., Westfield, was dismissed at the request of the commonwealth and a charge of possession of a class C drug was not prosecuted. In a second case also brought against Roberts by Westfield police, a charge of possession of a class A drug was not prosecuted and she was found to be not responsible for a charge of failure to stop or yield.

Mandi N. Hood, 27, of 49 Fuller St., Lee, submitted to facts sufficient to warrant a guilty finding for a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor brought by Westfield police and the charge was continued without a finding with probation for one year. She was assessed $600 and her license was suspended for 45 days. A charge of leaving the scene of property damage was ordered to be dismissed upon immediate payment of restitution in the amount of $622 and she was found to be not responsible for a marked lanes violation.

To Top